CE credits for result validation

I need 12 CE credits before March and am specifically looking for courses that get into method verification/validation, reportable range, delta checks, and CLIA/CAP documentation standards. If you’ve done an online program that helped tighten result validation workflows — like better lot-to-lot checks or LIS rule audits — please share which one and why it was worth it.

‌⁠‍⁠​‍​‍‌⁠‌​​‍​‍​⁠‍‍​‍​‍‌‍⁠​‌‍​‌‌‍​‍‌⁠‌​‌‍‌‌‌‍​⁠‌‍‍​‌‍⁠‍‌‍‍‌‌‍​⁠‌‍‍‌‌‍​‌‌‍⁠‍​‍​‍​‍⁠​​‍​‍‌‍‍⁠​‍​‍​⁠‍‍​‍​‍‌‍⁠‍‌‍‌‌‌⁠‌⁠‌‌⁠⁠‌⁠‌​‌‍⁠⁠‌⁠​​‌‍‍‌‌‍​⁠​‍​‍​‍⁠​​‍​‍‌‍‍‌‌‍‌​​‍​‍​⁠‍‍​‍​‍‌‍⁠‍‌‍‌‌‌⁠‌⁠​‍​‍​‍⁠​​‍​‍‌‍‌​​‍​‍​⁠‍‍​‍​‍​⁠​‍​⁠​​​⁠​‍​⁠‌‍​⁠​​​⁠​‌​⁠​‌​⁠‍​​‍​‍​‍⁠​​‍​‍‌‍‍​​‍​‍​⁠‍‍​‍​‍‌‍⁠​‌⁠​‌‌​‍‍‌⁠‍​‌​‍⁠​⁠​⁠‌‍‍‌‌​​‌​⁠‌‍‌​⁠⁠‌‍‌‍‌⁠‍​‌‍‌​‌​⁠‌‌​‌⁠‌‍‌‍​‍​‍‌⁠⁠‌​

, I was in the same 12-credits-by-March crunch and knocked it out with LabCE’s method verification/validation set — it hits ‘reportable range’, delta checks, and CLIA/CAP docs, and even nudged our lot-to-lot checks: https://www.labce.com/. Only caveat: the LIS rule audit piece is pretty basic, so I’d pair it with a CAP autoverification webinar or your LIS vendor’s guide. Do you need P.A.C.E. specifically?

‌⁠‍⁠​‍​‍‌⁠‌​​‍​‍​⁠‍‍​‍​‍‌‍⁠​‌‍​‌‌‍​‍‌⁠‌​‌‍‌‌‌‍​⁠‌‍‍​‌‍⁠‍‌‍‍‌‌‍​⁠‌‍‍‌‌‍​‌‌‍⁠‍​‍​‍​‍⁠​​‍​‍‌‍‍⁠​‍​‍​⁠‍‍​‍​‍‌⁠​‍‌‍‌‌‌⁠​​‌‍⁠​‌⁠‍‌​‍​‍​‍⁠​​‍​‍‌‍‍‌‌‍‌​​‍​‍​⁠‍‍​⁠​‌​⁠‌​​⁠‌‍​‍⁠​​‍​‍‌‍‌​​‍​‍​⁠‍‍​‍​‍​⁠​‍​⁠​​​⁠​‍​⁠‌‍​⁠​​​⁠​‌​⁠​‍​⁠​​​‍​‍​‍⁠​​‍​‍‌‍‍​​‍​‍​⁠‍‍​‍​‍‌‍‌⁠‌⁠‍‌‌​‍‍‌‍‍⁠‌⁠​​​⁠‍‌‌‌​⁠‌‍‌​‌‌​‍‌​​⁠‌‌​​‌​⁠​‌‌​⁠‌​‍​‌‌‌⁠‌​⁠⁠​‍​‍‌⁠⁠‌​

Took ADLM’s Method Validation Essentials bundle online and it was worth it for practical lot-to-lot comparisons and reportable range steps; best tip I’ve kept: “pull the delta-check override log monthly and trend the outliers,” which made our LIS rule audit actionable. It’s solid for CE and workflow tuning, but light on CLIA/CAP doc templates — if that’s your focus, tack on CLSI’s EP23 webinar: Education & Training | CLSI.

‌⁠‍⁠​‍​‍‌⁠‌​​‍​‍​⁠‍‍​‍​‍‌‍⁠​‌‍​‌‌‍​‍‌⁠‌​‌‍‌‌‌‍​⁠‌‍‍​‌‍⁠‍‌‍‍‌‌‍​⁠‌‍‍‌‌‍​‌‌‍⁠‍​‍​‍​‍⁠​​‍​‍‌‍‍⁠​‍​‍​⁠‍‍​‍​‍‌⁠​‍‌‍‌‌‌⁠​​‌‍⁠​‌⁠‍‌​‍​‍​‍⁠​​‍​‍‌‍‍‌‌‍‌​​‍​‍​⁠‍‍​⁠​‌​⁠‌​​⁠‌‍​‍⁠​​‍​‍‌‍‌​​‍​‍​⁠‍‍​‍​‍​⁠​‍​⁠​​​⁠​‍​⁠‌‍​⁠​​​⁠​‌​⁠​‍​⁠​⁠​‍​‍​‍⁠​​‍​‍‌‍‍​​‍​‍​⁠‍‍​‍​‍‌‌⁠⁠‌⁠‌​​⁠‌⁠‌‌​​‌‌‍‌‌​‍⁠​⁠‌⁠‌‌​‌​⁠‌‍‌​‌‌‌​⁠⁠​⁠​‌‌⁠​​‌⁠‍‌​⁠​​‌‍​⁠​‍​‍‌⁠⁠‌​